On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 18:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > At the last meeting FESCo decided they didn't feel it was necessary to > > review the SIGs as Features unless the Spin SIG/owner and rel-eng > > couldn't agree. > > > > Just sent it to rel-eng. > > This ping-pong doesn't help. FESCo should really decide if spins are > features are not. Take input from rel-eng if necessary but please make a > decision either way. They did make a decision. They decided that they aren't Features in the sense that FESCo doesn't need to review them unless there is a problem that needs to be escalated. Just like every other group/scenario we have. Rel-Eng has the approval authority for Spins. They want them treated as Features (as does the Spins SIG last I knew), so the only thing that is different is the approving body. There is no ping-ponging. Rel-eng just wanted to make sure FESCo didn't want to be the approving body. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
