On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 14:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > +1 for that. The policy Peter proposes is, quite frankly, going to be > ignored --- it's far too much work to lay on package maintainers. With respect, a simple "Add feature foo and fix bug bar" seems to me very little extra work at all. Even for my own packages when there are a lot of such notable changes, I include some of the most major in the Bodhi comment, then a link to the full upstream changelog - so it would not be terribly different from your idea alone...perhaps somewhat of a superset (if I may use the term loosely enough). > Not to mention that Bodhi hardly provides an interface conducive to > composing large, complex update messages. You can create one single file for the update notice, then merely use that in combination with the CLI bodhi-client utility. See https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/wiki/CLI for more details. Copy/paste with some minor editing (for the branch and dist tag) doesn't seem terribly difficult. =P -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
