On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 12:44 +0200, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > "If your package update contains a new release from upstream, add a link > to the full changelog of this new release in the %changelog field" > I strongly disagree. As I said in my original mail, the whole point of such a potential policy would be that users *should not* need to peruse through upstream changelogs and whatnot. More often than not, they tend to be very technical in nature and/or contain a significant amount of relatively insignificant commits (such as porting to a new third-party library API, build script fixes, etc.); and this - to me - contradicts Fedora's goal of showing how helpful and user-friendly FOSS can truly be. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list