On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:50 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > That said, it might also be worth doing this in two runs. One that > takes the view of F8, F8-updates, f9-updates and another than takes the > view of F8-updates-testing, F9-updates-testing. More things to play > with when I get back from OLS. Well I had a bit of time this morning, so I did it in two runs, one taking only -updates into consideration and one only taking -updates-testing into consideration. > > Another thought I had was that instead of listing the owners of > packages, we could actually list the person whom built the offending > E:N-V-R breaker. This is likely more interesting information anyway > since the owner can change per branch and the owner often isn't the > person doing the build anyway. I'll be looking to wire that up since > the builder is in the data set I get back from koji in the initial query > set. > I also did an ugly hack to get this in place. There is now a second list in the mail that is the broken paths sorted by builder, then sorted by package name. I'm still not mailing individual folks though. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
