Re: Proposal: Improving SELinux <--> user interaction on Fedora - Kerneloops for SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One other concern about report this AVC upstream, is a lot of these
> avc's are handled properly by the troubleshooter.  As an example the
> ldap query about the mislabled file.  Some of the plugins currently have
> a please bugzilla this context while others are pretty sure they know
> the problem.  So we maybe want to have the report this upstream button,
> only show up when setroubleshoot is baffled.

Agreed. I haven't had Setroubleshoot in Centos5 fail me yet.

> A lot of bugzilla's I get cut and paste the setroubleshoot window and
> then I respond by saying "Do what the troubleshouter told you to do!"
> Closed Not a Bug.

Seems like a human problem.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux