On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 10:19 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> There's absolutely nothing blocking you from sitting down with a
> checkout of current code
I did that. And then this huge update comes out of the blue (to me
anyway) due to the total disconnect between upstream SCM management and
our management. Not that I was complaining about the update in my
previous mails, I was complaining about the statement that since it
needs stabilized that it can't even tolerate some new headers (that
being all I asked for). But I do find it to be a fitting example of why
our SCM practices are in need of updating.
> and starting to make your changes so that you
> can submit some code against the updated branch to the rpm maintainers
> when the current release is out the door. No, it will not get into F10
> but I highly doubt that Fedora Policy to allow using source control
> repos interchangably with tarballs would be approved in time for F10 either.
Good God, how long does it take you guys to make a policy decision?
Should I submit a proposal and plan to argue it until F12 or some such
crap?
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
