On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> These packages are either unavailable in Fedora, or are currently being >> maintained, poorly, by overworked OLPC engineers who can't invest enough >> time to do them justice. There are lots of simple issues that even novice >> packagers could handle. Missing or broken dependencies. Creation of >> dead-simple activity packages. And so on. > > I think we need an overriding goal. Can we get a Fedora Sugar Desktop > Spin for standard pc hardware on the map and a SIG organized around > that effort? Would that put the right people together in the same > headspace to start working on packaging activities? A SIG wiki page in general would be good with things like a kickstart file to build the client version and the server version. It would allow easy testing for things like depedency creep for core packages and the like. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
