On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:07:52AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 23:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 03:53:14PM -0600, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > > Any particular reason to go with MinGW rather than Cygwin? Is there > > > room for both in the SIG? > > > > Cygwin has a licensing issue -- namely that it is GPL and so prevents > > any proprietary development on top of our libraries. > How can a toolchain not supporting proprietary development be an issue > to Fedora? It may-be sufficient reason for some users not use Cygwin, > but this his hardly Fedora's problem. If you didn't selectively quote me, you'd see I said it's not a problem for the MinGW SIG (ie. Fedora), but it is a problem for the libvirt project. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
