On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 23:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 03:53:14PM -0600, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > Any particular reason to go with MinGW rather than Cygwin? Is there > > room for both in the SIG? > > Cygwin has a licensing issue -- namely that it is GPL and so prevents > any proprietary development on top of our libraries. How can a toolchain not supporting proprietary development be an issue to Fedora? It may-be sufficient reason for some users not use Cygwin, but this his hardly Fedora's problem. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
