2008/7/5 David Nielsen <gnomeuser@xxxxxxxxx>:
Agreed
Regardless it seems to me that we are starting to need a Mono SIG to coordinate all this.
+1
Gnome-desktop-sharp is now available for review at :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454134
it shipped with all optional assemblies (including nautilusburn, wnck, vte, etc)
5. jul. 2008 08.16 skrev Xavier Lamien <laxathom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Correct,
gtkhtml has been removed from gnome-sharp and it is noted in the spec file as well but,
yeah not in the changelog, my bad to also forget added it in the changelog.
I'm already work to provide gnome-desktop-sharp quickly to fix this. the review request will be spawn in the next few hours.
Feel free to bug me on this.
This would probably have been good information to have in the mail announcing this version bump so maintainers would have minimal trouble.
Agreed
Regardless it seems to me that we are starting to need a Mono SIG to coordinate all this.
+1
I have previously offered free reviews for Mono packages, that offer still stands, I don't however feel I am a good maintainer so I would rather not take that role.
Gnome-desktop-sharp is now available for review at :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454134
it shipped with all optional assemblies (including nautilusburn, wnck, vte, etc)
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
