>>>>> "AL" == Alex Lancaster writes: [...] AL> Is this intentional? Or gtkhtml now provided by a different AL> package? In the 2.16 gnome-sharp package gtkhtml was provided: AL> If gtkhtml-sharp isn't packaged we need to get it into review AL> pronto. OK, looking into the .spec file and the sources for gnome-sharp, it seems that gtkhtml has been moved to a new package: gnome-desktop-sharp. This kind of things really should be noted in your %changelog as well as in the spec file as it makes a big difference for other packages, in addition the description: %description This package provides a library that allows you to build fully native graphical GNOME applications using Mono. gnome-sharp extends gtk-sharp2 and adds bindings for gconf, libgnome, gnome-vfs, libart, gtkhtml, librsvg, and vte. should be modified to remove gtkhtml and anything else that has been moved into gnome-desktop-sharp. This is why it's critical when you upgrade a core component of a mono stack in a major API/ABI bump (e.g. from 2.16 -> 2.20) that it needs to be announced in advance and co-ordinated amongst the set of maintainers of the mono "stack". This is much like KDE, GNOME, the whole stack needs to be updated as group because there is so much intermodule dependencies. Unfortunately (unlike GNOME) it appears that there are currently no Red Hat engineers assigned to maintain the mono stack as a group (probably because it isn't shipped in RHEL), nor is there a community SIG like there is for KDE. So maintaining the core mono stack currently seems to be done in an adhoc way, maintainer by maintainer, package by package. Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
