Re: What changelog to preserve at untrivial merging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:buc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Both packages have their own history. What changelog preserve in
    the new mailx in rawhide -- the old entries from mailx-8.x, the
    new entries from nail-12.3, or something else?


I would consider it a package rename, nail -> mailx, thus the nail changelog should be preserved.

Would it have been more appropriate to just have nail obsolete mailx?

Nope...

What is the actual upstream name?

...because the actual upstream name is "mailx". (It was "nail" initially, then it was renamed, since the original mailx-8.x development is stopped long time ago...)

Hence new "mailx-12.3" upgrades the previous one "mailx-8.x" and obsoletes "nail" (providing /usr/bin/nail symlink for backward compatibility).


~buc
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux