On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:31:32PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Both packages have their own history. What changelog preserve in the new > > mailx in rawhide -- the old entries from mailx-8.x, the new entries from > > nail-12.3, or something else? > > > I would consider it a package rename, nail -> mailx, thus the nail changelog > should be preserved. > > Would it have been more appropriate to just have nail obsolete mailx? What > is the actual upstream name? mailx could be kept in fedora, nail doesn't really obsolete it, like a rename do. I think that the issue here is that a virtual provide should be used for mail (or a file provide like /bin/mail) such that the package providing mail can change in time. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
