On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 15:19 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes: > > To be fair, it likely requires a ppc host to be able to investigate the > > problem to this level, and that's just not something everybody has > > sitting on their desk. > > Right, and that's why PPC (and PPC64 even more so) should be a secondary arch. > When the most mainstream "computer" with a PPC CPU is the PS3, you know you > have a problem. ;-) PPC as a primary arch made sense when Macs used it, not > anymore. > > (Hmmm, who decides what arches are primary? The Board? FESCo? Somebody else?) FESCo made the decision a while back that once another arch was up and running as a secondary arch, PPC would be moved from a primary to a secondary arch. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
