Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On 11 Jun 2008, at 16:06, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
This looks good, but on a minimal system how many other packages
would be pulled in as dependancies over the existing mailx?
For now, "openssl" (or "nss") and "krb5-libs". Is it OK for a minimal
system?
Both of those ought to be on a system anyhow (openssh would need them).
I was concerned that things like imap support could pull in a pile of
other deps
Nope, all such are supported by nail itself.
Regarding the minimal install -- Does it have Mozilla's nss library or
not? For the "Security Consolidation" process, recently started in
Fedora, we should build mailx/nail against nss (instead of openssl).
On the other hand, if the current "minimal installs" don`t have nss,
then IMHO we should still use openssl (at least while openssh uses it)...
~buc
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy
openssl is required by nash which is needed by mkinitrd which is in turn
needed by kernel. so IMHO openssl is here to stay, too.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
