Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Sorry, if I misunderstood. When someone describes an alternative to
promote their argument, I assume they are promoting the alternative as
well. But what did that mean if it's not what he wants?
It just means exactly what it says. If you don't agree with a license
terms, you don't get permission to distribute the software even if the
licensing terms seem odd to you as noted by a judge in the recent Skype
case for violating GPL.
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2008/05/08/
This simple fact requires no assumption on your part.
There are a near-infinite number of simple facts that someone could post
here. But why, unless they mean to promote or advocate them?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
