On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 09:42 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote: > Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 19:47 +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote: > >> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 01:46:42PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 13:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >>>> Dan Williams (dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >>>>> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:54 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote: > >>>>>> During the boot I have some samba shares mounted because I have them > >>>>>> configured to mount via fstab file. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> When I shutdown or reboot I get a screen for 2-3 minutes that shows > >>>>>> smbfs service trying to unmount samba shares but NM service has > >>>>>> already shutdown and there is no working network connection :( > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have seen this "bad" behaviour in F8 and have reported it on this > >>>>>> mailinglist, but I hoped that the new and smarter NM would take care > >>>>>> of it, but unfortunately it didn't :( > >>>>> Probably need to adjust the stop priorities of NM and haldaemon to be > >>>>> right after messagebus (K85) rather than where they currently are... > >>>>> The problem is that NM is being stopped to early. > >>>> 'After netfs' should be good enough. Although netfs stop should possibly > >>>> do lazy umounts. > >>> Ok, just need to bump NM a few bits later it looks like; might as well > >>> be K84 to be right after messagebus. > >> Why not go all the way to 90 as network to be on the safe side? With a > >> quick look I can see some scripts that might not be happy if the network > >> is down with a priority above 84, racoon/dund/rdisc/rpcgssd/nasd for example. > > > > NM depend on messagebus at least, so we should stop NM right before > > messagebus. But the same issues with startup are theoretically present > > with shutdown, meaning that since messagebus depends on rsyslog, and > > rsyslog depends on network. Standard installs don't use networked > > syslog, so standard installs don't actually need rsyslog to depend on > > network, but because rsyslog isn't smart enough to know when it does or > > does not depend on network, we can't just re-order the chain... :( > > > > Dan > > > > Dan what is the conclusion about this bug? This is a looong thread but > nothing is updated on bugzilla page so is there some consensus on what > needs to be done? I will move NetworkManager shutdown to be right before dbus. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
