2008/6/4 Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>: > I think its pretty clear at this point that default applications for a > given desktop environment should attempt to be native toolkit. We'd > need a damn good reason to want to prefer a qt based app as a default > app in GNOME... no matter what the functionality gap is between > applications in the same space. So making knote a default installed > application for a GNOME desktop would be less than optimal. But if > KDE users want to use it as a default, fine by me. This is a good point, although I notice recently it's being brought up as an argument against using KDE apps in GNOME space, despite there being a number of cases where GNOME / Gtk apps are recommended as (and in some cases required, like package kit) for use in KDE space ;o) The issue here is, the two "best" note takers both appear to be qt/kde-centric, alas ... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
