On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 14:00 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> writes: > > HdG> Well the question here IMHO is not so much how to name the > HdG> package as it is which fork to package, making them parallel > HdG> installable will be very hard todo and AFAIK we don't want > HdG> conflicting packages. > HdG> I believe that hylafax+ best fits Fedora. > > I don't see any point in attempting to decide which of many choices > fits Fedora; hylafax+ is simply the only one that's been submitted. ACK. > For comparison, Debian and Ubuntu don't seem to ship hylafax+; they > ship hylafax and in addition split the package into -client, -server > and -doc subpackages (which may be worth considering here). > > Gentoo has ebuilds for both hylafax and hylafax+ named accordingly. > > I'm not sure how to check Suse. SuSE ships "hylafax", originating from www.hylafax.org's hylafax-4.* tarballs with many patches having been added. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
