On Sat, 31 May 2008 07:24:22 -0500 Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 > based on rawhide as of 5-27-2008 (it takes a few days to build 5700 > packages twice). > > There is a proposal before FESCo to remove packages that Fail To Build > >From Source (FTBFS)[1] from the distribution, if the package owner > >has > no bug comments indicating it will be fixed in a reasonable amount of > time before the next major release. This would take place immediately > following the Alpha release[2]. Please comment on the thread on > fedora-devel-list[3], or come to the FESCo meeting next Thursday[4], > if you have concerns. > > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS > [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule (shows F9 presently, > extrapolate for F10) > [3] > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-May/msg02369.html > [4] > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Meetings > > > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ > > Total packages: 5722 > Number failed to build: 378 > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 35 > Leaving: 343 > (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) ... > With bugs filed: 151 > ---------------------------------- ... > dledford lat-1.2.3-3.fc9 ['241911 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) pghmcfc Bug #241911 is the ppc64 excludearch tracker bug for lat, not a FTBFS bug. The package currently fails to build in Rawhide due to broken deps in the mono stack that it buildreqs. Paul. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
