On Fri, 30 May 2008 22:02:25 -0400 "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:56:34 -0500 > > Matt Domsch <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > A little added twist here. I'd like to give the Fedora Board a chance > > > > at culling the list a little bit before sending on to Legal. There were > > > > a number of names that made it through the "is a" test and Legal that > > > > might not have been the best ideas for naming a release. Add to that > > > > the fact that Red Hat has used outside Legal to do the name clearance > > > > the last few times and that is a measurable cost both in time and money. > > > > The more names we ask to clear the more expensive and longer the delay > > > > will be before we have a set to vote upon. So I am asking the Fedora > > > > Board to review the list of names that Josh has collected and remove any > > > > they deem not acceptable as a Fedora release name before handing it to > > > > Legal. > > > > > > > > (Note, I haven't yet directly talked to the board about this, so I'm > > > > just assuming that they'll be on... board... with this.) > > > > > > Seems a very reasonable request. The Board doesn't want to limit > > > people's brainstorming, but I can see value in culling the list that's > > > sent out for trademark research. > > > > OK. So the current list I have is at: > > > > http://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/ > > Seeing what the relationship is would be nice. Fortunately they are all archived in the fedora-devel list. You'll get the relationship documented in the release page when the winner is picked. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
