On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 06:57 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > Let the naming begin! We're starting very early this time around in > the name game for F10. So, let the suggestions flow! This is the second or third time I have entirely missed the naming discussion. Why? Not all contributors slavishly read every word on fedora-devel-list. Next time, PLEASE, a cross-project announcement is in order. Otherwise you disenfranchise every project that does not have f-devel-l as their primary project list. Previously it was suggested that the people who make the distribution should be involved in the naming, that is why it is not on e.g. fedora-list. These days, I can't see how we can imagine making a distro without all of the other subprojects. Why should we name the distro without them? - Karsten > Remember the rules: > > 1) <NewName> must have some link to Sulphur > > More specifically, the link should be > Sulphur is a <blank> and > <NewName> is a <blank> > Where <blank> is the same for both > > 2) The link between <NewName> and Sulphur cannot be the same as between > Werewolf and Sulphur. That link was "things that react badly with > silver". > > I will be collecting suggestions for 1 week, so the cutoff for names is: > > May 29, 2008 > > Suggestions will be run through the legal queue and an election will > happen for Fedora contributors to pick the next Fedora name. > > josh > -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
