Re: Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Stone wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it is so easy, why don't you do it in your own repo?  Fedora is a
fully open distribution; all the necessary tools are there.

Should I make an assumption that you mean to say rpm is not a
"regular" tool.  Sure, you would have to add some documentation on how
to install it by first uninstalling X.  It's not so much compatibility
and support, but more a matter of convenience.

You have yet to explain how doing this effort, rebuilding the f8 xorg and hosting it in updates-testing for f9... is going to change IN ANY WAY the method you must follow for downgrading Xorg on F9. The version numbers are still going to be lower than the F9 xorg unless you deliberately break everything sane about rpm versioning in order to force them to upgrade.

Insisting that those rpms need rebuilt and specifically hosted for f9 is stupidity. Downgrading xorg using the current F8 rpms works just fine. It takes exactly the same effort as attempting to downgrade xorg using rpms with a silly .fc9 in their name. You download rpms, you install them, you prevent them from getting updated by f9 rpms.

--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
 gpg 0x8300BF29 fingerprint 071D FFE0 4CBC 13FC 7DEB  5BD5 5F89 8E1B 8300 BF29

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux