On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 18:58 +0200, Mark wrote: > 2008/5/21 Trond Danielsen <trond.danielsen@xxxxxxxxx>: > > 2008/5/21 Mark <markg85@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> That basically that everyone that is a member of FAS becomes something > >> like an Admin on the fedora planet.. they can add as much blogs as > >> they want (and probably remove tthe ones they added as well) which > >> just means he is an admin over the entered blog urls. > >> > >> I find it verry strange if this is what you guys want.. > > > > I find this lack of trust in Fedora contributors very strange; has it > > not occurred to you that the powers granted by cvs access, bugzilla > > accounts and mailing list membership can do far more harm to the > > community than a hostile blog aggregated on planet F? Admins are still > > around to clear things out if lets say I go mad and start adding all > > sorts of blogs that post offensive content to planet F, but until then > > I believe that people who sign up to become a Fedora contributor do it > > to improve Fedora and not the opposite. > > > > Best Regards, > > -- > > Trond Danielsen > > > > I thrust the fedora community! > I've just seen abusive things earlier when people get to much rights > and would hate to see that happen on planet fedora. Encouraging speech means you sometimes have to put up with some bullshit, too. Instead of trying to build-in prohibitions to it I think it is best to respond on a case-by-case issue. We've built-in configuration to let us quickly pull problematic feeds if we so choose. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
