Re: Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/5/21 Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>:

> For future upstream X.org releases, date tracking important milestone
> points, outside of git might be a PR win.  It doesn't need to be as
> detailed as Fedora's schedule of events, if Xorg's process doesn't
> support that much structure and roadmapping.  And its something that a
> hardcore developer doesn't need to do.  I'll keep an eye out for the
> next Xorg release push, and volunteer to do the housekeeping with
> regard to milestone signposting outside of git, if Xorg upstream would
> find value with help doing that auxiliary task.  Free free to punch me
> in the side of the head and remind me that I volunteered to do it, if
> I things start up without me having approached upstream directly.

Yes, but nVidia do have a full time employee who participates in X.org
development. So they should have known about this.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux