On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 10:40 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out why a package that built for F8 and F9 failed > > on Rawhide. Here are the logs for the failed Rawhide bid: > > Any suggestions what's going on here? > > Dunno, but I came across this yesterday too. A package that built > everywhere apart from ppc64 (and had built previously on F9) failed on > ppc64: The culprit is upstreams shipping outdated config.guess/config.sub's. AFAICT, until recently, rpmbuild replaced config.guess/config.sub during builts, and now has been changed to use the original files upstreams ship. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
