Re: Did the "uname" change on ppc64 in Rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mary Ellen Foster wrote, at 05/21/2008 06:30 PM +9:00:
I'm trying to figure out why a package that built for F8 and F9 failed
on Rawhide. Here are the logs for the failed Rawhide bid:

    http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=622220

In this build, "configure" dies with:
    checking build system type...
    Invalid configuration `ppc64-redhat-linux-gnu': machine
`ppc64-redhat' not recognized
    configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub ppc64-redhat-linux-gnu failed

Whereas on F8 and F9 on PPC64, building the identical SRPM works fine
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=622181 and
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=622176) and the
corresponding output from "configure" in both cases is:
    checking build system type...
    powerpc64-redhat-linux-gnu
    [ ... continue configuring ... ]

Any suggestions what's going on here?

Similar exaple:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906#c19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906#c20

This is because redhat-rpm-config dehavior changed on F-10:
* Wed May 07 2008 Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> - 9.0.3-1
- Remove overwritten config.guess|sub files (testing).

This affects %configure macro. On F-8/9 %configure replaces
config.{sub,guess} in the tarball with /usr/lib/rpm/config.{sub,guess}
while on F-10 it does not.

Regards,
Mamoru

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux