On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:52:02AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: > > > It works better would be the short answer. Having run both of > > > them through a test suite (available at > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestResults/Fedora9Swfdec/Rawhide), > > > swfdec performed *much* better, not the least because it supports > > > a larger subset of Flash 9. > > > > Are the results for gnash somewhere? > > Probably not, sorry. > > > And for which version? > > Whatever was in rawhide for F9 at the time. If the time of the wikipage writing is that time, then it was 0.8.2, it is a bit strange. I tested them with 0.8.2 and the result are similar than with swfdec, except for "Photobucket Slideshow". > Note that another issue in swfdec's favor is gst-missing-plugins support. I searched google with gst-missing-plugins but didn't found anything relevant. Is there a web page for that? Also there was adiscussion about that on the gnash mailing list if I recall well, and there may be people not willing to help proprietary codecs, but I don't remember well. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
