Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: > > It works better would be the short answer. Having run both of > > them through a test suite (available at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestResults/Fedora9Swfdec/Rawhide), > > swfdec performed *much* better, not the least because it supports > > a larger subset of Flash 9. > > Are the results for gnash somewhere? Probably not, sorry. > And for which version? Whatever was in rawhide for F9 at the time. Note that another issue in swfdec's favor is gst-missing-plugins support. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
