Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mardi 13 mai 2008 à 14:25 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway a écrit :
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 20:20 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
A. Derivation: something you take, modify without looking back
I would say that the Fedora Java packages fall rather squarely here.
Tomcat is a rather good example.

If you had bothered to read and understand the meaning of the Xjpp_Yfc
convention, and then looked at the versions in
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/tomcat5/tomcat5.spec?rev=1.111&view=log

you'd have seen the Fedora log is littered with Fedora<=> jpp resyncs
(it's easy look at when the jpp numbering part changes)


Nicolas, I believe you're wrong. I can't find a single revision by devrim that syncs from the JPackage spec[1]_ to the Fedora spec.

Tomcat6 was imported from jpp 6 weeks ago.

Different maintainer, different package, different methodology for maintaining that package.

.. _[1]: http://www.jpackage.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/rpms/free/tomcat5/tomcat5.spec?root=jpackage&view=log

-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux