> Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Which I think illustrates the point that JPackage isn't the upstream for the tomcat5 package, yes? > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > It seems far more appropriate to say that the Fedora package is derived from JPackage. Perhaps you two can explain to me the difference between what you consider package derivation vs. upstream in the context of packaging... In my mind if you base your package off of the packaging work of others, those others are (or in this instance should be) upstream for the package. Again the Fedora/RHEL analogy seems to fit. It feels like splitting semantic hairs to me but you may have a real distinction which I'd like to hear. If there is debate there that is likely the part I'm not understanding, but then I'm just a pig wallowing in mud so what do I know. Jason -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
