Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mardi 13 mai 2008 à 10:47 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
And why are the jpackage tomcat RPMS upstream for our RPMS? It seems quite plain from the changelog you quoted that they are not.

So the kernel packages are not downstreamed from kernel.org? They have a
lot more fedora-specific patches.

1) Last I looked, kernel.org didn't release SRPMS.

2) The Fedora Tomcat package does not currently seem to be syncing against JPackage. So JPackage is not the upstream for the tomcat package. The source code in the kernel package, otoh, is being synced against the source code on upstream kernel.org.

The fedora packages are rebased every once in a while. That's why it's
an upstream/downstream thing. The parts which are shared and reused are
bigger than the parts Fedora-specific (very often because the changes
have not been bushed jpp-side)

But that's not the case with the current tomcat package. The current tomcat is a derivation of JPackage because it was started from the JPackage package (by a different maintainer) but is not syncing changes back and forth now. And there's nothing in FESCo policy or Packaging Guidelines that mandate that this must happen.

Does there need to be a stronger connection between Fedora and JPackage with a policy? Something that states that all Fedora java packages must be in JPackage first and be based off of them? The results of this discussion will probably influence that.

Note that has never been a demand. The demand has been to avoid
needlessly making the package flow and collaboration harder.

Very true. I'm saying that our current process is falling down. We aren't to the point where we're getting the worst of both worlds (the two worlds being: making packages which are totally separate from JPackage and making packages which are only rebuilds of JPackage [or even just including the JPackage repo]) but we're definitely not getting the best of them. I think we need to swing the pendulum one way or the other.

-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux