Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 13 mai 2008 à 10:47 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
>  
> And why are the jpackage tomcat RPMS upstream for our RPMS?  It seems 
> quite plain from the changelog you quoted that they are not.

So the kernel packages are not downstreamed from kernel.org? They have a
lot more fedora-specific patches.

The fedora packages are rebased every once in a while. That's why it's
an upstream/downstream thing. The parts which are shared and reused are
bigger than the parts Fedora-specific (very often because the changes
have not been bushed jpp-side)

> Does there need to be a stronger connection between Fedora and JPackage 
> with a policy?  Something that states that all Fedora java packages must 
> be in JPackage first and be based off of them?  The results of this 
> discussion will probably influence that.  

Note that has never been a demand. The demand has been to avoid
needlessly making the package flow and collaboration harder.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux