On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:37 AM, George Billios <gbillios@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Take this for example: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XserverOnePointFive > > It mentions that it is a prelease version but it doesn't justify why > including a prelease version is ok. Benefits are detailed on that page. Or you saying the listed details concerning the benefits of including the pre-release of the of 1.5 are not detailed enough for you? And even more importantly this has gone through the Features process and has been reviewed...by FESCO..via a transparent and open review process that requires status updates to be performed. If there was a significant problem with the proposed feature, there have been multiple points in the release process where people could have raised a red flag before the Feature Freeze deadline For reference: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Schedule We have an open and transparent Feature process, I see no evidence that the process was misused for this particular feature. The decision to change to pre-release was made in the FESCO april 10th meeting as part of the Feature completeness agenda item. Here is the irc log for reference: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/FESCo-2008-04-10.html In the future for Fedora 10, I hope that you will watch the FESCO meeting agenda posts to -devel-list, and will participate in the irc meetings when the Feature process discussion is on the agenda so that any concerns you have can be addressed as part of the discussion. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
