Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 06:10:50PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> How do you call projects who stick with antiquated tools and ignore many
> years of development? I call them poorly maintained.

'Mature'?  Actually while I personally tend to use whatever version of
autoconf is installed for my own stuff, I have found a couple of
upstream projects that use autoconf 2.13 and are opposed to upgrading,
so that is going to be a problem.  Unfortunately I can't find the
packages in question at the moment, but I'll try to dig them up
tomorrow when I'm reunited with my laptop.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux