On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 11:57 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > This step is way over due. It also will teach maintainers not run the > > autotools while building. > > Thats your personal preference. Your liberty to think this. > No need to force that on all of us. How do you call SW that relies upon x years old bugs? I call it poorly maintained. How do you call projects who stick with antiquated tools and ignore many years of development? I call them poorly maintained. Or differently: Upstream projects which stick with these antiquated versions are as poorly maintained and dead as projects written in KnR or projects staying with gtk-1. - These projects have had many years to update their code ... and failed. Now they've got to learn the hard way. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
