Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
[...snip...]

them.  So autoconf213 is needed for firefox development.  That's
certainly a valid reason, and it should be documented somewhere (in
the autoconf213 spec, maybe) so that we won't forget next year when
someone again asks why we still have autoconf213 around.

Perhaps we can port a few packages over to a recent automake and get
rid of some of the old versions.  It certainly wouldn't be a bad
thing.


*cough* HackFest *cough*

-Jeroen

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux