Re: Upstream developers mainting there own package in Fedora and nothing else

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt wrote:

>> And now I'm wondering what others think of this and if maybe we should
>> get some kinda special procedure for this?
> 
> My first thought was "do we really need policies for everything"?
> 
> Can't we just say that the sponsors have permission to approve accounts
> so new contributors may join and get productive?
> If you agree with an upstream developer on maintaining a package in
> Fedora, either alone or with you as co-maintainer, does it matter how you
> do it?

big +1

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux