On 04.05.2008 10:24, Till Maas wrote: > On Sun May 4 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> from the early Fedora-days seem mostly inactive as well. Thus a general >> cleanup in that group (²) might be wise -- but on the other hand it >> likely doesn't matter much in the end so might not be worth the trouble. >> (²) -- and in cvsextras itself as well -- there are likely a lot of >> contributors in that group that left or are AWOL > > Iirc everybody had to change his password to keep his account alive after the > transition to FAS2, Ohh, yeah, forgot about that. But that doesn't matter much afaics, as users or an attacker could just reactive the account by reseting the password -- at least that how I read the footnote in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-March/msg00772.html > therefore the cvsextras group should not contain many > inactive maintainers. Well, it afaics does, as https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/dump/cvsextras for example still includes Jose Pedro Oliveira -- hasn't he left long ago? Anyway: I don't care much; just tried to be helpful with my mail (which was about a totally different topic). It's up to FESCo to decide what to do with people that left with or without notice. Cu knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
