On Sun May 4 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > from the early Fedora-days seem mostly inactive as well. Thus a general > cleanup in that group (²) might be wise -- but on the other hand it > likely doesn't matter much in the end so might not be worth the trouble. > (²) -- and in cvsextras itself as well -- there are likely a lot of > contributors in that group that left or are AWOL Iirc everybody had to change his password to keep his account alive after the transition to FAS2, therefore the cvsextras group should not contain many inactive maintainers. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
