On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 04.05.2008 12:46, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 16:55 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > >> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> Which administrators are you talking about? > >> The following people would not receive mail sent to > >> cvsextras-sponsors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > >> > >> bpepple,bdpepple@xxxxxxxxx,Brian Pepple,administrator,7 > >> gdk,gdk@xxxxxxxxxx,Greg DeKoenigsberg,administrator,0 > >> skvidal,skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Seth Vidal,administrator,3 > >> sopwith,sopwith+fedora@xxxxxxxxx,Elliot Lee,administrator,21 > >> spot,tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx,Tom Callaway,administrator,38 > >> thl,fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,Thorsten Leemhuis,administrator,6 > >> wtogami,wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx,Warren Togami 砥上勇,administrator,55 > >> > >> Are you wishing to exclude these people from the process? I think not..... > > It they are sponsors, they should be subscribed - period. > > Just a note, it's no real list An irrelevant implementation detail to users (sponsors). > > If not, they should not be. > > As I mentioned already, I got the mail and thus I suspect other admins > got it as well. The point behind such list is to reach a competent and qualified group to evaluate candidates + to keep related discussions confident. I would take anybody lurking on this list who does not belong to this group (rsp. public archives of such discussion) as a severe breach of confidence on whoever administers this stuff's part. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
