On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 23:46 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Cool. Let me send it there then. > > Problem with sending it there (as the lone sponsor in 'fedorabugs') is > that the administrators Which administrators are you talking about? This list was supposed to be only visible/readable to sponsors, not to nominees nor to arbitrary admins nor to arbitrary readers. > don't get mail that's sent there (not sure if > that's a problem with cvsextras or not). We once had the convention that all sponsors were obliged to be subscribed on this "list". I don't recall if it had been an automated process. > I agree that such a > discussion shouldn't be held in public, however. Sure. The purpose of this list had been to vote on nominees before they had been presented to FESCO. Ralf PS: I wonder if the fact no sponsors have been nominated for a very long time and the fact we are discussing details of the nomination process, which actually should "just work", is a reflection of the sponsorship model having failed. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
