Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: is xorg.conf still needed
From: Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 17:41:20 +0200
Organization: Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl2 (Linux)

On 2008-05-02, 03:12 GMT, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
> I think you're confusing Stateless Linux with Stateless Linux 
> Desktop.

You are confusing Stateless Linux and Online Desktop.

Matěj

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is xorg.conf still needed
  - From: dwight at supercomputer.org

References:
- is xorg.conf still needed
  - From: Rodd Clarkson
- Re: is xorg.conf still needed
  - From: dwight at supercomputer.org
- Re: is xorg.conf still needed
  - From: Callum Lerwick
- Re: is xorg.conf still needed
  - From: dwight at supercomputer.org

Prev by Date: Re: Multilib Middle-Ground
Next by Date: Re: How to downgrade Fedora to previous release?
Previous by thread: Re: is xorg.conf still needed
Next by thread: Re: is xorg.conf still needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux