Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 04:56 -0800, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
> I don't believe it, but your reply doesn't answer my question. 
> Where's the roadmap, and what's the plan for getting there? And 
> who's in charge, and who's involved?

Who's involved? Google is currently leading the way, especially in the
"back end":

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/var_0.html

GNOME is working on a front end:

http://live.gnome.org/OnlineDesktop

And Red Hat is integrating it all:

http://mugshot.org/

If you're expecting roadmaps and plans, you're going to be disappointed.
This is new territory, just being discovered. Who's in charge? Whoever
gets there first.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux