Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 19:29 -0800, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 01:13:27 am Matej Cepl wrote:
> 
> > The whole truth is that we are on the way towards Stateless Linux
> > (which means here xorg.conf-less X), but we are not there yet. To
> > be honest, the way is long and the question is whether we will
> > arrive at Fedora 10 or later. 
> > ...
> 
> Are we really? Upon what do you base that statement? I'd be very 
> interested in knowing more, because the Stateless Linux mailing list 
> looks rather inactive. Is there a roadmap? And what's the current 
> status?

We're on our way to the Online Desktop, in which the operating system
itself starts to barely matter at all. (Which should draw people to
Linux since its cheap and reliable, right? :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux