On 2008-04-30, 02:52 GMT, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > I'm pretty sure that from comments made either on this list or > fedora-test that we are moving in a direction where the norm will be > that no xorg.conf file is needed and therefor won't be created. > > I'm having discussions with someone about this at the moment and would > appreciate some clarification on where things are head so that this can > be addressed at their end.[1] > > [1] The nvidia service from livna tries to > run /usr/sbin/nvidia-config-display which seems to require a xorg.conf > file in place. It appears that either (a) livna will need to work > around the absence of this file by creating one (how?), and eventually > (b) that nvidia will need to rewrite their software to recognize that > the file need not exist. The whole truth is that we are on the way towards Stateless Linux (which means here xorg.conf-less X), but we are not there yet. To be honest, the way is long and the question is whether we will arrive at Fedora 10 or later. To make my point clear, we consider since Fedora Core 6 to be a bug, when Xorg doesn't work at all withtout /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but that doesn't mean that everybody should have 3D, etc. automagically. And of course binary-only nvidia drivers are The Pure Evil(TM), so those won't be supported ever. > -- > "It's a fine line between denial and faith. > It's much better on my side" Which one it is? ;-) Best, Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
