On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:47 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:26:33 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > It is not a problem, just unneeded. It adds difference with upstream, > > may require patching and so on, > > Usually, a 'sed -i' line in %setup is enough, so I wouldn't call it a > big burden. > > > better leave it to te packager. > > Sure. But I think a "recommendation" line somewhere might actually be > good, with some rationale that it: > - allows rpm to get the dependencies right > - avoids user confusion when the wrong interpreter is called > - maybe something else I forget... - Must not go through env for setuid / consolehelper - Must not go through env if it "uses" SELinux, in targeted at least. ...I've also seen multiple instances where people had non-system python interpreters first in their path, so going through env broke all the time. But I'm not sure how much we care about that in Fedora? -- James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
