On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:47:36AM +0200, Christian Iseli wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:26:33 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > It is not a problem, just unneeded. It adds difference with upstream, > > may require patching and so on, > > Usually, a 'sed -i' line in %setup is enough, so I wouldn't call it a > big burden. Indeed, but guidelines are already big, so if it possible not to add mandadorily guidelines, it is better. > > better leave it to te packager. > > Sure. But I think a "recommendation" line somewhere might actually be > good, with some rationale that it: > - allows rpm to get the dependencies right > - avoids user confusion when the wrong interpreter is called > - maybe something else I forget... I fully agree, but it shouldn't be a guideline, only a recommendation (in a place where we put recommentdations). -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
