Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Most of this should not be necessary. We have, or had, a modified version of >> ecj that always generates debuginfo when an RPM is being compiled, so >> if there exists any RPM that is missing debuginfo, that is a regression. >> >> Also, when AOT-compiling, we should be generating the full paths for all >> the source files and therefore all the sources should be in the debuginfo >> packages. >> >> Please tell me which package is missing these, and I'll find out which >> of these mechanisms has broken. > > axis-debuginfo-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm which, despite the name, is > the current package for F8. It looks like it was generated before the > fix went in. Right, that makes sense. > Dare I suggest a rebuild of all Java packages of sufficient age? You can suggest it, but I doubt that it's worthwhile. After all, it's easy for anyone to rebuild the package. Trouble is, they have know way to know that's all they have to do; I know of no easy solution for that. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
