On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Most of this should not be necessary. We have, or had, a modified version of > ecj that always generates debuginfo when an RPM is being compiled, so > if there exists any RPM that is missing debuginfo, that is a regression. > > Also, when AOT-compiling, we should be generating the full paths for all > the source files and therefore all the sources should be in the debuginfo > packages. > > Please tell me which package is missing these, and I'll find out which > of these mechanisms has broken. axis-debuginfo-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm which, despite the name, is the current package for F8. It looks like it was generated before the fix went in. Dare I suggest a rebuild of all Java packages of sufficient age? Also, if anyone cares, my problem did indeed turn out to be a bug in axis 1.2.1 which was fixed in 1.3 or 1.4. (I went straight to 1.4 to check, so I don't know which version fixed the bug.) I see there is a request for an upgrade to 1.4 [1], but it is being held up by some problems with xml-security [2]. I'm not sure we should even bother, though, since the project has been obsoleted by axis2 [3]. References: [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231153 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 [3] http://ws.apache.org/axis2/ -- Jerry James http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
